Modèle:Cladogramme Hominina

Une phylogénie possible des différentes espèces d'hominines[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] :

 Documentation modèle sans paramètre[purger]

Ceci est la documentation du modèle {{Cladogramme Hominina}}. Il affiche un cladogramme.

Utilisation

  • {{Cladogramme Hominina}}

Le modèle s’utilise sans paramètre.

Références

  1. (en) Lee R. Berger, John Hawks, Paul HGM Dirks, Marina Elliott et Eric M. Roberts, « Homo naledi and Pleistocene hominin evolution in subequatorial Africa », eLife, vol. 6,‎ (PMID 28483041, PMCID 5423770, DOI 10.7554/elife.24234, lire en ligne, consulté le )
  2. David Strait, Frederick Grine et John Fleagle, Analyzing Hominin Hominin Phylogeny: Cladistic Approach, , 1989–2014 (cladogram p. 2006) (ISBN 978-3-642-39978-7, lire en ligne)
  3. The conventional estimate on the age of H. habilis is at roughly 2.1 to 2.3 million years. Stringer, C.B., The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, , « Evolution of early humans », p. 242 Friedemann Schrenk, Ottmar Kullmer, Timothy Bromage, "The Earliest Putative Homo Fossils", chapter 9 in: Winfried Henke, Ian Tattersall (eds.), Handbook of Paleoanthropology, 2007, pp. 1611–1631, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-33761-4_52. Suggestions for pushing back the age to 2.8 Mya were made in 2015 based on the discovery of a jawbone: Fred Spoor, Philipp Gunz, Simon Neubauer, Stefanie Stelzer, Nadia Scott, Amandus Kwekason et M. Christopher Dean, « Reconstructed Homo habilis type OH 7 suggests deep-rooted species diversity in early Homo », Nature, vol. 519, no 7541,‎ , p. 83–86 (ISSN 0028-0836, PMID 25739632, DOI 10.1038/nature14224, Bibcode 2015Natur.519...83S, lire en ligne)
  4. Angela M.H. Schuster, « Earliest Remains of Genus Homo », Archaeology, vol. 50, no 1,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le ) The line to the earliest members of Homo were derived from Australopithecus, a genus which had separated from the Chimpanzee–human last common ancestor by late Miocène or early Pliocène times.
  5. H. erectus in the narrow sense (the Asian species) was extinct by 140,000 years ago, Homo erectus soloensis, found in Java, is considered the latest known survival of H. erectus. Formerly dated to as late as 50,000 to 40,000 years ago, a 2011 study pushed back the date of its extinction of H. e. soloensis to 143,000 years ago at the latest, more likely before 550,000 years ago. Indriati E, Swisher CC III, Lepre C, Quinn RL, Suriyanto RA, et al. 2011 The Age of the 20 Meter Solo River Terrace, Java, Indonesia and the Survival of Homo erectus in Asia.PLoS ONE 6(6): e21562. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021562.
  6. (en) Oscar Lao, Jaume Bertranpetit et Mayukh Mondal, « Approximate Bayesian computation with deep learning supports a third archaic introgression in Asia and Oceania », Nature Communications, vol. 10, no 1,‎ , p. 246 (ISSN 2041-1723, PMID 30651539, PMCID 6335398, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-08089-7, lire en ligne)
  7. (en) Valery Zeitoun, « High occurrence of a basicranial feature in Homo erectus: Anatomical description of the preglenoid tubercle », The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, vol. 274B, no 1,‎ , p. 148–156 (ISSN 1552-4914, PMID 12964205, DOI 10.1002/ar.b.10028)
  8. M. Dembo, N.J. Matzke et M. Collard, « Bayesian analysis of a morphological supermatrix sheds light on controversial fossil hominin relationships », Proceedings. Biological Sciences, vol. 282, no 1812,‎ , p. 20150943 (PMID 26202999, PMCID 4528516, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2015.0943)
  9. Dembo, « The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods », (DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.04.008, consulté le )
  10. A. Mounier et M. Caparros, « The phylogenetic status of Homo heidelbergensis – a cladistic study of Middle Pleistocene hominins », BMSAP, vol. 27, nos 3-4,‎ , p. 110–134 (ISSN 0037-8984, DOI 10.1007/s13219-015-0127-4, lire en ligne)