Discussion:Mochizuki Chiyome

Dernier commentaire : il y a 6 ans par Munch2015 dans le sujet The Original Description is Completely Wrong
Autres discussions [liste]
  • Admissibilité
  • Neutralité
  • Droit d'auteur
  • Article de qualité
  • Bon article
  • Lumière sur
  • À faire
  • Archives
  • Commons

The Original Description is Completely Wrong

modifier

I cannot speak French. So I am sorry but I write it in English.

I am an editor of Japanase Wikipedia.

Recently, I read a book of Japanese ninja, it says "Mochizuki Chiyome does not exist in fact, although some web site, such as Wikipedia, insists her existence. Her biography of Wikipedia is completely wrong".

- 吉丸雄哉(三重大学人文学部准教授) (2017年4月). “望月千代女伝の虚妄”. In 吉丸雄哉、山田雄司 編. 忍者の誕生. 勉誠出版.  (ISBN 978-4-585-22151-7).

The book is reliable because the author of the book is an associate professor of a university who studies Japanese ninja.

On the other hand, citations of the article "Mochizuki Chiyome" of wikipedia is based on unreliable references such as a site of video game, a book written by a non-academic writer and so on.

So, I re-write the article "Mochizuki Chiyome" of Japanese and English versions of Wikipedia.

The article "Mochizuki Chiyome" of Itarian seems to be based on Japanese or English version of Wikipedia, which means that this is wrong as well.

fr:Mochizuki Chiyome was wrong as well because it is based on ja and/or en.

So could you translate English version of "Mochizuki Chiyome"?

--Munch2015 (discuter) 17 août 2017 à 14:21 (CEST)Répondre

Revenir à la page « Mochizuki Chiyome ».