Discussion:Dominique Caillat

Autres discussions [liste]
  • Admissibilité
  • Neutralité
  • Droit d'auteur
  • Article de qualité
  • Bon article
  • Lumière sur
  • À faire
  • Archives
  • Commons

J'ai ajouté ce jour le bandeau d'interrogation sur l'admissibilité pour plusieurs raisons :

  • la plupart des références proviennent du site officiel de l'artiste.
  • on n'a pas d'informations sur la notoriété des différentes oeuvres citées
  • l'article a été créé à peu près simultanément sur trois wiki (de, en & fr) par le même utilisateur.

Ces différents points me font penser à de l'autopromotion. Symac (d) 1 janvier 2010 à 14:56 (CET)Répondre

Admissibilité

modifier

A few words about the origin of this article. I contribute mostly in WP:de and WQ:de, some in Commons, little in en: and almost nothing in fr: Here I discuss in en, because in fr it would be too much work for me. To write the article about Dominique Caillat in fr I had to use the help of a friend for the translation from the de version. I used my personal space to develop the basics of these pages between Dec 20 and 31 (de en fr).

The writing of the article was triggered by seeing the Dominique Caillat's play "Darwins Beichte" in Basel on Dec. 5th - impressing me deeply -, which went on to tour all of Switzerland, as the play was the official contribution of the Swiss Academy of Science to Darwin's bicentennial. To compose articles about Dominique Caillat was fairly easy, because she has such an excellent homepage in all three languages, with very detailed information - including lots of press reviews. Though mostly from German newspapers, since she works mostly in that language, the essence of it is also translated into en and fr (french version). My impression is that her notoriety is not to be doubted at all. At the moment I am preparing some direct links to documents online, other than the official homepage of Dominique Caillat: I found over 50 articles in newspaper archives, including highly positive press reviews, reports of prizes and awards, a full-page portrait in the national German weekly "Die Zeit", and so on. I will include links to a selection of these press reports.

Having done that, hopefully the admissibility of the article is verified enough, and an administrator will soon remove the red sign on top of the page. Best regards - --Zwikki (d) 4 janvier 2010 à 10:38 (CET)Répondre

PS: Thanks to Utilisateur:Huster for adapting the references / links to the style as usual in wp:fr (a style which would not be allowed e.g. in wp:de).

Suppression du signal "d'admissibilité "

modifier

To whom it may concern:
Since 01.01.2010, when the "admissibility sign" was issued, this artice about Dominique Caillat has been considerably enhanced. Please reconsider the admissibility now again - and remove the sign as soon as possible.
Best regards --Zwikki (d) 6 janvier 2010 à 16:01 (CET)Répondre

Article englais: "rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale"

modifier

Please consider also the evaluation of this article by w:en:

  • "This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography"
  • "and has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale"

with less online documented information.
Best regards --Zwikki (d) 8 janvier 2010 à 20:51 (CET)Répondre

Revenir à la page « Dominique Caillat ».